| 
   
 
City and County of San Francisco 
  Municipal Transportation Agency 
  Citizens’ Advisory Council
Finance  and Administration Committee
Thursday, February 2,  at 1:30 p.m.  
  1 South Van Ness Avenue, Conference Room 3239 
  San Francisco, California 
MINUTES 
1.Call to Order:   
  The CAC Secretary called the meeting to order at 1:50 p.m.   
2. Roll Call: 
FAC Members present  at Roll Call:   Susan  Vaughan 
FAC Members absent:  Daniel Murphy 
CAC members, not on this committee,  but also present:  Steve Ferrario and  Marc Salomon 
Susan Vaughan  appointed Steve Ferrario and Marc Salomon to serve as Pro Tem 
3. Announcement of  prohibition of sound producing devices during the meeting: 
The CAC Secretary made the announcement. 
4. Adopt Minutes of November 16, 2011:   
Council  member Vaughan continued approval of the November 16, 2012 minutes to the next  meeting.  
Public comment: 
None 
5. Report of the Chairman (For discussion only):  
None 
Daniel Murphy arrived at 1:55 p.m. 
6. Public Comment:    
Edward Mason commented on solar panels at the  VTA’s bus yard in San Jose and inquired if Muni will be looking into solar  panels as a possible source of revenue. 
David Pilpel commented that the MTA is paying  PUC more for power and there will be a half-cent a year increase in power for  the next four years.  Mr. Pilpel stated  the MTA has been paying less than PUC’s cost for distributing power, but  getting closer to the cost of service.   As to the general budget, Mr. Pilpel suggests that this committee meet  more on a regular schedule and receive quarterly reports from staff on budget  performance by division and overtime spending. 
7. Presentation,  discussion and possible action regarding budget balancing panel.  (Sonali Bose, CFO/Director, Finance &  Information Technology)  
Sonali Bose stated she was not at the last  panel meeting, but mentioned that the Mayor asked the Director of Transportation  to establish a panel to look at ways to address short and long term budget  issues.  The 25-member panel meets the  first and third Tuesday of each month at 9:00 a.m. either on the 3rd  or 7th floor.  Panel members  include persons from the transit riders union, local coalition, MAAC, Chambers  of Commerce, Spur, TWU, labor council and the Union Square business  district.  Anyone may attend these  meetings since they are passive and no public comment or minutes are taken. 
Ms. Bose stated that the February 7 meeting  will be the third meeting.  So far, the  panel members have given ideas of ways to balance the budget.  The next step would be to start putting  numbers on recommendations so by the eighth week there would be a consensus  among the panel. 
Council member Salomon stated that the agency  take steps to build public confidence before asking for more resources and to  make sure that all revenues goes to Muni for transit operations. 
Public  Comment: 
Edward Mason commented on the transparency  and the public confidence in Muni.  Mr.  Mason stated that Muni is almost an $800M operation and should have an auditor  general.  Mr. Mason stated he is  disappointed that the Charter does not allow for an auditor general or an individual/organization  to make correlations. 
(Sonali Bose replied that an auditor can be  brought in by submitting a work order to the Controller’s Office and paying for  this service.) 
David Pilpel wanted to circulate the audit  committee findings from the VTA.  Mr.  Pilpel commented on the comparison between Muni and PUC, $100M versus $1M.  He stated the PUC is thought of as running a  well-managed shop, people pay for water and sewer service.  PUC is more managed and Mr. Pilpel stated  some models and lessons can be learned from them, and there is no reason why  the MTA can be reliable and deliver service.   As to the panel, Mr. Pilpel would encourage diversity or to have town  hall meetings. 
(Sonali Bose mentioned that the Director of  Transportation will be doing workshops in neighborhoods to discuss the budget.) 
      Motion 120202.04 
The SFMTA CAC  recommends the agency take steps to build public confidence before asking for  more resources.  Steps should include  that all new transit revenues should go to transit service only and no new  revenues be allocated to work orders to other city departments and existing  work orders should be rolled back to the extent practicable.  The Budget Balancing Panel should bring forth  short, medium, and long term revenue and cost savings solutions. 
On Motion to approve  Motion 120202.04:  Approved 
      Ayes – Murphy and Vaughan 
      Nayes – None 
      Absent – None 
8. Presentation, discussion  and possible action regarding FY 2012 and FY 2013 operating and capital budgets. (Sonali  Bose, CFO/Director, Finance and Information Technology)  
Sonali Bose discussed the preliminary budget  numbers that were presented at the November MTA board meeting.   Staff will go back to the board and  workshops would be conducted by the Director of Transportation between  mid-February or mid-March.  Ms. Bose  stated that projected revenues are shown higher in FY 2013, but may be affected  by the youth fare. 
Ms. Bose stated that labor costs are the  biggest expenditure in the SFMTA Operating Budget and that there is a projected  budget deficit in FY 2013 and 2014.   There is about $25-$30M budgeted for maintenance, but that amount is not  enough.  Workers compensation has  exceeded the budget by $6M.  Overtime and  absenteeism has also affected the budget.    Ms. Bose stated that the budget  will be presented at the February 21 SFMTA Board meeting. 
Public comment: 
David Pilpel stated that charging for  transfers for cash only payment or increasing the single cash fare as possible  additional revenue sources are a bad idea.   Mr. Pilpel believes that transit is underfunded, but needs more than  strength, such as more explanations of new programs and interaction on programs  should be discussed with commissions, like the PUC does. 
      Motion 120202.05 
Whereas Section  8A.109 of the Charter of City and County of San Francisco requires the SFMTA  Board to seek new revenue sources, the SFMTA CAC recommends that the SFMTA  Board of Directors consider the following for additional revenue in the FY 2013  and FY 2014 budget. 
  - Increasing  the meter bagging fee
 
  - Increase  citations by $3.00 to offset the Courthouse Fee
 
  - Extend  parking meter hours to nighttime hours
 
  - Extend  parking meter hours to Sundays
 
  - Add  500 to 1,000 new metered spaces
 
  - Enforce  the existing parking garage pricing ordinance
 
  - Extend  the parking garage ordinance to all parking lots and garages citywide
 
 
            On  Motion to approve Motion 120202.05:  Approved 
                  Ayes  – Murphy and Vaughan 
                  Nayes  – None  
                  Absent  – None  
            Motion 120202.06 
The SFMTA CAC  recommends that, if the Board considers charging for transfers or increasing  the single cash fare for non-Clipper users that it opt for the latter  option.  The SFMTA CAC urges the Board to  examine the experience of AC Transit in implementing these options. 
            On  Motion to approve Motion 120202.06: Approved 
                  Ayes – Murphy and Vaughan 
                  Nayes  – None  
                  Absent  - None 
9. Committee Member requests for information (For discussion only)   
None 
10. Schedule upcoming calendar items.  (For discussion only)  
  Next regular meeting: Wednesday, March  21, 2012, at 3:00 p.m. 
1 South Van Ness  Avenue, 3rd Floor, Conference Room 3075 
ADJOURN:  The meeting was adjourned at 3:50 p.m.  
Respectfully submitted by: 
  Yvette Torres 
  SFMTA CAC - Secretary  
  
  
Accessible meeting policy – One South Van Ness Avenue
 |